How Does Tobacco Smoke Affect a Developing Baby Answers.com
- Research commodity
- Open Access
- Published:
Smoking during pregnancy and harm reduction in birth weight: a cantankerous-exclusive study
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth volume 18, Commodity number:67 (2018) Cite this commodity
Abstract
Background
Different studies take shown the advantages of forbearance from cigarette smoking during pregnancy to promote full fetal evolution. Given that pregnant women do not e'er abstain from smoking, this written report aimed to clarify the upshot of different intensities of smoking on birth weight of the newborn.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was adopted to explore smoking in a population of pregnant women from a medium-sized city in São Paulo state, Brazil, who gave birth between Jan and June of 2012. Data were collected from maternal and pediatric medical files and, where data were absent, they were collected by interview during hospitalization for delivery. For data analysis, the effect of potential confounding variables on newborn birth weight was estimated using a gamma response model. The effect of the identified confounding variables was also estimated by means of a gamma response regression model.
Results
The prevalence of smoking during pregnancy was 13.iv% in the report population. In full-term infants, birth weight decreased every bit the category of cigarette number per twenty-four hours increased, with a pregnant weight reduction equally of the category 6 to 10 cigarettes per day. Compared with infants born to not smoking mothers, mean birth weight was 320 g lower in infants whose mothers smoked 6 to x cigarettes per twenty-four hour period and 435 g lower in infants whose mothers smoked 11 to 40 cigarettes per twenty-four hour period during pregnancy.
Conclusions
Based on the written report results and the principle of harm reduction, if a pregnant adult female is unable to quit smoking, she should be encouraged to reduce consumption to less than six cigarettes per twenty-four hour period.
Peer Review reports
Background
Since the adoption of the Framework Convention on Tobacco by member countries of the World Health Organization in 2003, at that place have been important global deportment to control smoking. Despite this, the smoking "epidemic" has grown in some countries considering of the marketing power of the tobacco industry, population growth in countries with extensive consumption, and the number of highly dependent people who are unable to quit smoking [i].
The Centers for Illness Command and Prevention has estimated that xix.0% of American adults smoked cigarettes in 2011 [ii]. The Special Survey on Smoking, a supplement to the 2008 Brazilian National Household Sample Survey, reported a smoking prevalence rate of 17.2% for people anile 15 years or older [3]. In the adult population of 27 Brazilian cities, 14.8% were smokers, and the frequency was greater for men (18.one%) than for women (12.0%) [4].
Information technology is known that smoking tin can crusade lung and other cancers, heart illness, stroke and many other diseases [2]. When associated with pregnancy, tobacco consumption can have even more astringent effects, potentially compromising not only maternal wellness, just as well fetal health and viability [5]. In the Usa, about 20% of women are smokers at the beginning of pregnancy; however, 30.2% to 61% give up smoking in the prenatal period [6]. Women who are able to quit tend to accept been lite smokers [7]. There are no national Brazilian information on the prevalence of smoking during pregnancy, nor are in that location estimates on smoking cessation during pregnancy; however, a population-based study carried out in Santa Maria, southern Brazil, reported that 23% of pregnant women were smokers [viii].
Cigarettes are amidst the most frequently used drugs in pregnancy [ix]. A Brazilian study identified greater chance of smoking during pregnancy in women with a higher number of previous pregnancies and who did not undergo prenatal care [8].
Smoking in pregnancy is likewise associated with cognitive disabilities in the newborn, slower fetal growth, abortion and premature nascence [8, 9].
The mechanisms through which smoking leads to negative effects during pregnancy take not been fully understood. Nicotine likely plays an of import role. Nicotine causes reduction in uteroplacental circulation, leading to lower maternal weight gain and in turn, negative fetal outcomes, such as minor size for gestational age, depression nativity weight, brusque stature and compromised fetal neurological development. Additionally, cigarettes and their smoke contain more than 4000 potentially toxic substances, and the combination of these toxins in cigarette smoke may exist the principal factor responsible for health harm [10].
Other important negative furnishings of smoking are seen in pregnancy and the postpartum period. During pregnancy, smoking compromises local and systemic immune responses, which in plough may be associated with agin pregnancy outcomes [11]. Postpartum, cigarettes can cause early cessation of breastfeeding and consequences for child health and development [12].
Although there are countless studies in the literature confirming the relationship between smoking and low nascency weight, they take not considered the dose–response effect of smoking on low nascency weight [v, 8, 13]. In view of the loftier prevalence of smoking during pregnancy in Brazil, the high likelihood of adverse perinatal consequences and the difficulty of quitting, this study aimed to analyze the effect of unlike intensities of smoking on nascence weight of the newborn.
Methods
This cantankerous-sectional study evaluated smoking in meaning women from 13 small towns belonging to the "Colegiado Pólo Cuesta", a health network in Botucatu, a medium-sized metropolis (140,000 inhabitants) in southeastern São Paulo, Brazil.
In Botucatu, the Public Health Service operates 18 principal care units that provide basic health care and other health services. Childbirth care is provided past specialty obstetrics and neonatology services at a university referral infirmary, which has xl beds for pregnant/puerperal women, 24 beds for newborns, xxx beds in the Intensive Intendance Unit (ICU) for adults and xv beds for neonates.
In addition to public health services, private health insurance and services are also available in Botucatu. There is one private maternity hospital with sixteen beds for pregnant/puerperal women, six beds for newborns and an boosted ten beds in the ICU for both adults and neonates.
Systematic sampling was used in this written report: all pregnant women admitted to give birth at either of the two maternity hospitals during the study period from January 1 to June 30, 2012, were considered eligible for the study. Only women pregnant with a single fetus were included in the study. A total of 1404 pregnant/puerperal women met those conditions. 7 women refused to participate and 84 were discharged before data collection was possible; thus, the final sample consisted of 1313 meaning/puerperal women, representing 93.5% of the eligible study population.
All subjects gave informed written consent prior to their participation in the study, in accordance with established principles of research ethics. The written report was approved past the Research Ethics Committee of Botucatu Medical School (approval number 004/2013).
The variable under investigation was smoking during pregnancy (classified equally: no; yes, from one to 5 cigarettes per mean solar day; yes, from 6 to 10 cigarettes per day and yes, from eleven to 40 cigarettes per day. With this option, the study aimed to analyze the effect of different intensities of smoking on birth weight of the newborn compared to the birth weight of newborns from nonsmoker pregnant women. Smoking during pregnancy data were obtained from medical records (56.iii%) and when they were not recorded, they were obtained during interviews (43.7%) with the puerperal women in the infirmary where the birth took place. In the interviews, the question asked was: "Practice/Did you fume during gestation period? If so, how many cigarettes practice/did you usually smoke per day". For both forms of data collection, women who reported having smoked just as they did non know they were pregnant or for a short period of gestation (n = half dozen) were classified equally non-smoking. Women classified as smokers during gestation were those who reported having maintained this habit throughout pregnancy.
Data were also collected on potentially misreckoning sociodemographic, medical and behavioral variables. Sociodemographic variables included: historic period (classified as ≤19 years, 20–34 years, ≥ 35 years); education (≤ 8 years, 9–11 years, ≥ 12 years); paid employment (yeah/no); and presence of a partner (yes/no). Medical variables included data on obstetrical history, namely: first pregnancy, yes/no; the interval betwixt deliveries, simply for multiparous women (≤ 2 years, 3–5 years, ≥ half dozen years); and pregestational overweight or obesity (based on body mass index and classified according to the Institute of Medicine) [xiv] (yeah/no). The quality of prenatal care was also investigated using the variables: place of care (public service facility, private service facility); number of medical visits (observing that 7 visits are proposed as minimum by the Brazilian Ministry of Health), (< 7 visits, 7–xiv visits, ≥ 15 visits, subsequently classified into < vii visits, ≥ 7 visits); participation in a prenatal educational grouping (yeah/no); previous advice regarding alarm signs in pregnancy (yes/no); and employ of both folic acrid (as of the beginning prenatal visit) and iron sulfate (as of the 20th calendar week of gestation)(aye/no). Finally, the presence of whatever bug during gestation (yes/no) was investigated, including emotional problems; alcoholic beverage consumption; use of illegal drugs; anemia; loftier claret pressure, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, or hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome; diabetes; hyperemesis; hemorrhage, bleeding, or threatened abortion; and infection, such as syphilis, urinary tract infection, toxoplasmosis, human being immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or hepatitis.
Infant data were also nerveless to evaluate effects. The outcome variable was birth weight (g). Given the close human relationship betwixt birth weight and gestational age, the effects of smoking on term and premature newborns were studied separately [15, 16]; therefore, information were besides collected on the birth condition (preterm, total-term) for stratification.
Merely as for the data on smoking, all these other data were obtained from maternal or infant medical records (including prenatal care cards and records from the delivery room or the nursery) during hospital admission for commitment. Data that were not recorded were obtained by interview with the meaning/puerperal women, likewise during infirmary admission.
All data were collected past authorized health service professionals, nether the supervision of a doctoral student in public health who was responsible for quality control. The data were input to a database and checked for consistency before statistical analysis.
The data analyses were performed in 2 phases. Offset, the effect of each possible confounding variable on newborn weight was estimated using a univariate gamma response model (crude assay); variables with p < 0.20 were called equally potential confounders for inclusion in the post-obit multivariate analysis. In the 2d phase, the smoking consequence, corrected for the effect of the identified confounders, was estimated using a gamma response regression model (adapted assay). This model was selected for its ability to simultaneously gauge the chief effect and correct for the effect of potential confounders (following the disproportionate probability distribution of the outcome). Relationships were considered significant if p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSS v twenty.0.
Results
Virtually study participants were aged 20–34 years and had 8 to 11 years of school attendance. Considering premature and term newborns, most mothers lived with a partner respectively), employed (49.seven% and 56.5%, respectively), were multiparous (57.1% and 62.0%, respectively) and prenatal follow-upwardly had been provided by public services (75.ane% and 70.iv%, respectively). Among the women who had preterm commitment (north = 189), 59.three% had attended ≤7 medical visits; among those who delivered at term (n = 1124), 73.ii% had attended eight–14 prenatal visits.
The prevalence of smoking was xviii.0% among mothers of premature infants and 12.half dozen% among mothers of term infants. In both groups, the median of the number of cigarettes smoked per mean solar day ranged from i to forty cigarettes/solar day. The preterm nativity rate was 14.4%. Median birth weight was 2410 g and 3250 g for premature and full-term infants, respectively (Table 1).
The relationship between potential confounders and weight of premature infants is also shown in Table two. Attendance at ≥7 prenatal medical visits; participation in a prenatal educational group; presence of emotional problems; high blood force per unit area, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or HELLP syndrome; hyperemesis; hemorrhage, bleeding or threatened abortion; and infection during pregnancy were all identified as possible confounders (p < 0.20).
The relationship between smoking during pregnancy and nativity weight of premature infants, adjusted for potential confounders (adjusted analysis), is shown in Tabular array iii. Again, no significant deviation in birth weight was establish in relation to smoking.
In contrast, in full-term infants the post-obit potential confounding factors (p < 0.twenty) were identified: presence of a partner; first pregnancy; interval betwixt deliveries; attendance at ≥7 prenatal visits; emotional bug during pregnancy; historic period at delivery; illegal drug use; anemia; loftier blood pressure, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or HELLP syndrome; hyperemesis; and infection during pregnancy (Tabular array 4).
The independent effect of smoking intensity on nascency weight was estimated correcting for the potential misreckoning variables in the adjusted regression model (Table 5). Newborn weight decreased as the category of number of cigarettes per mean solar day increased, with a pregnant reduction at the 6 to x cigarettes: when mothers smoked 6 to 10 cigarettes per twenty-four hour period, infant weight was 320.41 yard (CI 95% = − 535.51 to − 105,32) lower than that of infants born to nonsmoker mothers; when mothers smoked 10 to 40 cigarettes per twenty-four hour period, babe weight was 435.01 g (CI 95% = − 733.16 to − 136,87) lower than that of infants born to nonsmoker mothers. When the mother smoked during pregnancy up to 5 cigarettes per mean solar day there was no consequence on birth weight (p = 0.715).
Discussion
This study evaluated the prevalence of smoking and the relationship between nascency weight and smoking intensity in a population of women who gave birth in a medium-sized city in southeastern Brazil. The impact of tabagism was evaluated using a cathegorized design instead of a continuous variable, considering of the irregular distribution of the variable and loftier proportion of zeros (nonsmoker mothers). That procedure was performed and then that a dilution of the smoking result could be avoided (mean effect), and the impact of different loads of maternal smoking could be detected: 1 to 5 cigarretes per twenty-four hour period or light smokers, half-dozen to ten or medium smokers and xi to 40 or heavier smokers.
Assay of the premature baby data showed no statistically significant differences between the birth weight of infants built-in to smoking and nonsmoking pregnant women. In contrast, the analysis of total-term infants revealed a negative, dose–response upshot of smoking on newborn weight. Compared with infants born to nonsmoking mothers, mean nascency weight was 320 one thousand lower in newborns whose mothers smoked 6–x cigarettes per day and 435 k lower in newborns whose mothers smoked 11–40 cigarettes per day during pregnancy. This consequence was observed even afterward correction for identified potential confounders, such equally maternal age, presence of a partner, parity, interval between deliveries, number of prenatal medical visits, emotional problems in pregnancy, illegal drug use, anemia, high claret pressure, hyperemesis, gestational age and infection during pregnancy. Interestingly, no statistically significant differences were plant in mean nascence weight when mothers smoked 1–5 cigarettes per day.
An important consideration is that the accuracy of the information on smoking and the number of cigarettes smoked per day during pregnancy may limit the validity of the written report findings. It is known that the number of cigarettes smoked per day can vary throughout pregnancy [17], and this was not addressed in the cross-sectional blueprint of the present study, which relied on self-reporting at the time of delivery or medical records. Besides, women who reported having quit the addiction just at the get-go of gestation were considered as nonsmokers, and the passive exposure to tobacco smoke (not investigated) was not considered, which could result in some underestimation of the smoking effect on nativity weight. Nevertheless, an of import negative effect was observed.
The data are representative of a single place in the southeastern region of Brazil. The prevalence of smoking in the pregnant women that was found in our study (overall prevalence of 13.4%) corroborates the importance of agreement its furnishings. The smoking prevalence amid meaning women in Botucatu was lower than that in not-significant adult women in São Paulo capital urban center (16.eight%) and higher to the average value reported in other Brazilian capitals (12%), the only population information available for comparisons [4]. Furthermore, smoking furnishings are mainly a result of biological processes, and that fact as well may support the generalization of our findings. Yet, information technology is likely that in similar contexts and populations (middle-income countries with good availability of prenatal intendance), tobacco use during pregnancy volition negatively affect term newborn weight to a similar extension every bit it did in the present study.
About twoscore% of pregnant women are estimated to quit smoking spontaneously, primarily out of concerns for fetal health only besides, out of business organization for their ain. Others may be encouraged to quit smoking, through concerted counseling about the risks of smoking to fetus and mother that begins at the initiation of prenatal intendance [18]. On the whole, pregnant women are receptive to educational measures and wellness promotion [17] and are more likely to consider smoking cessation in the context of the frequent contact with wellness professionals during prenatal intendance [9]. Appropriately, the prenatal protocol of the Brazilian Health Ministry [16] instructs that smoking pregnant women be identified in prenatal medical visits, advised to quit and offered back up to reach this goal. As such, the findings of the study population are worrying. Information technology is likely that not all pregnant women were accordingly counseled during their medical visits. The loftier prevalence of smoking in the study population shows that deportment to accost prevention of tobacco use in general and, particularly, during prenatal intendance, accept been inadequate in the study region.
Despite the need for smoking abeyance, it may be more than challenging to achieve it during pregnancy, especially considering that a powerful psychoactive drug, nicotine, causes chemical addiction to smoking [19]. Nicotine replacement therapy has been effective in helping the addicted population to quit smoking [20] and thus, reduces harm from smoking; even so, its apply during pregnancy is controversial [21]. Questions remain nigh long-term furnishings and the safety of nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy and the postpartum period [13, 21, 22].
From the perspective of practical advice for significant women unable to quit smoking, the study findings support the recommendation of less than six cigarettes a day to minimize the negative effects of smoking on newborn weight; however, this must be validated with farther studies evaluating the effects of reduced tobacco use on nativity weight and on other outcomes, such as prematurity, stillbirth and sudden infant death syndrome.
Conclusions
The written report showed that smoking during pregnancy is associated with lower nascence weight in full-term infants. Smoking intensity is also important. The report found a dose–response that was pregnant every bit of the 6 to x cigarette-per-solar day category.
The high reported prevalence of smoking amongst women during pregnancy shows that actions to promote and support smoking cessation during pregnancy are definitely necessary in the study region. Smoke-gratuitous policies, both at a national level and globally, must remain strict, specially when related to recommendations of complete smoking abeyance during pregnancy. If, however, the goal of total abstinence proves impossible, there is even so an opportunity to minimize the negative furnishings of smoking during pregnancy on nascence weight by reducing as much as possible the number of cigarettes smoked per day.
Abbreviations
- HELLP:
-
Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, depression platelet count
- HIV:
-
Human immunodeficiency virus
- ICU:
-
Intensive Care Unit
- SPSS:
-
Statistical parcel for the social sciences
References
-
World Wellness Organization. WHO study on the global tobacco epidemic, 2011. Alert about the dangers of tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Available from: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240687813_eng.pdf. [cited 2015 Mar xx].
-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Electric current cigarette smoking among adults – United States, 2011. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(44):889–94.
-
Instituto Nacional exercise Câncer. Organização Pan-Americana de Saúde: Pesquisa especial de tabagismo. PETab. Relatório Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional do Câncer; 2011. Bachelor from: bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/pesquisa_especial_tabagismo_petab.pdf
-
Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Vigitel Brasil 2011: Vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2012.
-
Murin S, Rafii R, Bilello K. Smoking and smoking cessation in pregnancy. Clin Breast Med. 2011;32:75–91.
-
Tong VT, Jones JR, Dietz PM, D'Angelo D, Bombard JM. Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy - pregnancy chance assessment monitoring system (PRAMS) Usa, 31 sites, 2000-2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009;58:1–29.
-
Stotts AL, Groff JY, Velasquez MM, Benjamin-Garner R, Light-green C, Carbonari JP, et al. Ultrasound feedback and motivational interviewing targeting smoking cessation in the 2nd and third trimesters of pregnancy. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11:961–8.
-
Galão AO, Soder SA, Gerhardt M, Faertes TH, Krüger MS, Pereira DF, et al. Efeitos do fumo materno durante a gestação e complicações perinatais. Rev HCPA. 2009;29:218–24.
-
Motta GCP, Echer IC, Lucena AF. Fatores associados ao tabagismo na gestação. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2010;18:08 telas.
-
Ontario Medical Association (OMA). Rethinking stop-smoking medications: treatment myths and medical realities. Ontario Med Rev. 2008;75(ane):22–34. Available from: http://youcanmakeithappen.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/2008RethinkingStop-SmokingMedications.pdf. [cited 2015 Mar 20].
-
Prins JR, Hylkema MN, JJHM E, Huitema S, Dekkema GJ, Dijkstra FE, et al. Smoking during pregnancy influences the maternal immune response in mice and humans. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:76.e1–14.
-
Del Ciampo LA, Ricco RG, Ferraz IS, Daneluzzi JC, Martinelli Junior CE. Prevalence of smoking and booze consumption among mothers of infants under six months of age. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2009;27:361–5.
-
Jaddoe VW, Troe EJ, Hofman A, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Steegers EA, et al. Active and passive maternal smoking during pregnancy and the risks of low birthweight and preterm birth: the generation R written report. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008;22:162–71.
-
Institute of Medicine. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington: Institute of Medicine; 2009. Bachelor from: http://world wide web.nationalacademies.org/hmd/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2009/Weight-Gain-During-Pregnancy-Reexamining-the-Guidelines/Report%20Brief%twenty-%20Weight%20Gain%20During%20Pregnancy.pdf. [cited 2016 Mar twenty].
-
Barros FC, Victora CG, Matijasevich A, Santos IS, Horta BL, Silveira MF, et al. Preterm births, depression birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction in three nativity cohorts in southern Brasil: 1982, 1993 and 2004. Cad Saúde Pública. 2008;24(Suppl 3):S390–8.
-
World Health System. Guidelines on optimal feeding of depression nascence-weight infants in low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/9789241548366.pdf?ua=one. [cited 2015 Mar 20].
-
da Saúde Yard. Secretaria de Atenção a Saúde. Cadernos de Atenção Básica: Atenção ao Pré-natal de Baixo Risco. Ministério da Saúde: Brasília (DF); 2012.
-
Reichert J, Araújo AJ, Gonçalves CMC, Godoy I, Chatkin JM, Sales MPU, et al. Diretrizes para cessação do tabagismo. J Bras Pneumol. 2008;34:845–80.
-
Grief SN. Nicotine dependence: wellness consequences, smoking cessation therapies, and pharmacotherapy. Prim Care Clin Office Pract. 2011;38:23–39.
-
Beard E, Aveyard P, Brown J, West R. Assessing the association between the use of NRT for smoking reduction and attempts to quit smoking using propensity score matching. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;126:354–61.
-
Brose LS, McEwen A, West R. Association between nicotine replacement therapy use in pregnancy and smoking cessation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;128:15–9.
-
Bruin JE, Gerstein HC, Holloway Air conditioning. Long-term consequences of fetal and neonatal nicotine exposure: a critical review. Toxicol Sci. 2010;116:364–74.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the São Paulo Research Foundation for funding this research.
Availability of data and materials
The authors are happy to share anonymized data related to this paper upon receiving a specific request, along with the purpose of that request. Interested parties may contact nana_carvalheira@hotmail.com.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
All authors take made substantial contributions to the written report, and all endorsed the data and conclusions. MCK contributed to conception and pattern of the study, data acquisition, and analysis and estimation of data. APPC contributed to conception and design of the report, data acquisition, and assay and interpretation of data; participated in writing the typhoon manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content, and gave terminal blessing of the version to be published. APF participated in writing the typhoon manuscript and revised information technology critically for important intellectual content, and gave concluding approval of the version to be published. MBM participated in writing the draft manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published. MABLC participated in writing the typhoon manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published. CMGLP participated in writing the draft manuscript and revised information technology critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approving of the version to be published.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent for publication
NA
Competing interests
The authors declare that they take no competing interests.
Publisher'due south Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you requite advisable credit to the original writer(s) and the source, provide a link to the Artistic Eatables license, and bespeak if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zippo/ane.0/) applies to the information made bachelor in this commodity, unless otherwise stated.
Reprints and Permissions
Almost this article
Cite this article
Kataoka, M.C., Carvalheira, A.P.P., Ferrari, A.P. et al. Smoking during pregnancy and harm reduction in birth weight: a cantankerous-sectional written report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth eighteen, 67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1694-4
-
Received:
-
Accepted:
-
Published:
-
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1694-4
Keywords
- Pregnancy
- Smoking
- Tobacco apply cessation
- Nativity weight
Source: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-018-1694-4
0 Response to "How Does Tobacco Smoke Affect a Developing Baby Answers.com"
Enregistrer un commentaire